top of page

Aligning Outcomes, Activities, and Assessments

Learning Environment & Situational Factors to Consider

 

1.  Specific Context of the Teaching/Learning Situation

How many students are in the class?  Is the course primary, secondary, undergraduate, or graduate level?  How long and frequent are the class meetings?  How will the course be delivered: live, online, blended, flipped or in a classroom or lab?  What physical elements of the learning environment will affect the class? What technology, networking and access issues will affect the class?

  • Program expected to have 8-12 participants.

  • The program consists of professional adult learners with previous teaching experience, working as a first-year educational diagnostician.

  • The educational diagnostician program will be delivered in a blended learning environment.

  • A physical barrier may be reserving the special education resource room.

  • Although there are no expected technological or network issues foreseen, on barrier may be participants level of proficiency with technology.

 

2.  General Context of the Learning Situation

What learning expectations are placed on this course or curriculum by: the school, district, university, college and/or department?  the profession?  society? 

Texas Education Agency Standards

  • Knowing the motive, philosophy and legislative requirements of assessment and special education services is expected.

  •  Ethics are essential to providing services through practice.

  • Establishing relationships with other players in the educational process, such as parents and outside and related services, is also required.

  • Knowledge of assessment practices and utilizing that information to make appropriate educational decisions is another competency set forth. This includes having the ability to plan and make instructional decisions for students.

  • Educational diagnosticians must also be able to identify students with disabilities and determine educational need for services.

  • Formal and informal assessment methods should be known and utilized.

  • Educational diagnosticians must be able to manage time and resources appropriately to maintain compliance with timelines and provide efficient services.

  • Appropriate assessments, evaluation and strategies should be utilized to address students’ behavioral and social needs.

  • Because educational diagnosticians assist with creating educational plans for students, an understanding of curriculum and educational strategies is important.

​

3.  Nature of the Subject

Is this subject primarily theoretical, practical, or a combination?  Is the subject primarily convergent or divergent?  Are there important changes or controversies occurring within the field?

  • The educational diagnostician program will hinge largely on practical learning as participants will have to implement learning to real life situations.

  • Both convergent and divergent thinking will be incorporated in the program. Activities and collaboration will allow for the exploration of many possible strategies when considering a variation in recommendations, test batteries, and Individualized Education Plans. However, convergent thinking while occur when consideration is given regarding certain topics, such as a student’s eligibility for special education services.

 

4.  Characteristics of the Learners

What is the life situation of the learners (e.g., socio-economic, cultural, personal, family, professional goals)?  What prior knowledge, experiences, and initial feelings do students usually have about this subject?  What are their learning goals and expectations?

  • Adult professional learners

  • Adult learners may have family obligations that impact flexibility outside of normal work hours.

  • Learners should have previous teaching experience and be familiar with instructional strategies and grade level expectations.

  • Program participants have a learning goal of conducting accurate evaluations that translate into detailed reports that outline the student's strengths, weaknesses, eligibility (if any), and recommendations.

 

5.  Characteristics of the Teacher

What beliefs and values does the teacher have about teaching and learning?  What is his/her attitude toward:  the subject? students? What level of knowledge or familiarity does s/he have with this subject?  What are his/her strengths in teaching? 

  • The teacher believes all students can learn when a growth mindset is cultivated and opportunities for learning experiences are provide in a significant learning environment which is student centered and furthers passion, stimulates imagination, while setting boundaries resulting in authentic learning. Furthermore, effective teaching requires teachers to take the time to learn about the needs, learning students, interest, and readiness levels of their students. Building relationships with students creates the foundation for learning, as teachers become better equipped to facilitate meaningful learning experiences once teacher-student relationships are established.

  • The teacher believes program participants want to effectuate positive changes for students receiving special education services.

  • The teacher has worked as an educational diagnostician for eight years and served as a diagnostician mentor for three years.

  • Teacher has experience training other educational professionals in areas such as curriculum writing, instructional strategies, and classroom management.

Questions for Formulating Significant Learning Goals

 

A year (or more) after this course is over, I want and hope that students will be able to evaluate identified students for special education services, determine appropriateness of various supports, and serve as a resource to administrators, teachers, parents, and students.

 

My Big Harry Audacious Goal (BHAG) for the course is: Prepare novice diagnosticians with evaluating students for special education services, analyzing evaluation results to determine eligibility for special education services, formulating reports to describe and explain evaluation findings, and provide recommendations to support students receiving special education services while complying with state timeframes.

​

Foundational Knowledge

What key information (e.g., facts, terms, formulae, concepts, principles, relationships, etc.) is/are important for students to understand and remember in the future?

What key ideas (or perspectives) are important for students to understand in this course?

  • Comprehensive understanding of Procedural Safeguards

  • Able to reference and apply the Legal Framework

  • Eligibility areas for special education services

  • Recommendations, resources, and supports for students, parents, and administrators.

 

Application Goals

What kinds of thinking are important for students to learn?

  • Critical thinking, in which students analyze and evaluate

  • Creative thinking, in which students imagine and create

  • Practical thinking, in which students solve problems and make decisions

What important skills do students need to gain?

Do students need to learn how to manage complex projects?

  • Critical thinking skills are required for evaluating students and analyzing results from the evaluation.

  • Practical thinking skills are required in aligning identified deficits areas with appropriate interventions.

  • Creative thinking skills are required because educational diagnosticians are often presented with unique cases in which there is not a clear method to accommodate the student. The diagnostician may have to be imaginative and creative in designing the best recommendations to meet the individual needs of the student.

  • Program participants need the critical skills of interpreting the seven cognitive areas and understanding how the align to academic learning.

  • Educational diagnosticians must manage and work as a member of the multidisciplinary team. The educational diagnostician should identified specific areas of need for the student and identify additional personnel or support needed to address those needs.

 

Integration Goals

What connections (similarities and interactions) should students recognize and make…:

  • The educational diagnostician should be able to connect the testing results to interpreting results in a report that is then used to identify eligibility and/or specific needs of the student. Should a student qualify for special education services the Full Individual Evaluation should align directly with the student’s Individualized Education Plan.

  • Program components should connect with prior knowledge program participants have as teachers that include instructional strategies, classroom management, and differentiated instructional strategies.

  • Modifications and accommodations are a part of life that are often not realized. For example, some individuals may require a special diet, hearing device, or a calming ball. It is incumbent upon educational diagnosticians to understand the importance of research-based accommodations and modifications to support the specific needs of students to allow them access to the educational environment and assist them with reaching their full potential.

 

Human Dimensions Goals

What could or should students learn about themselves?

What could or should students learn about understanding others and/or interacting with them?

  • Program participants should have the ability to work with others, support parents, and support campus personnel that may work with the students.

  • Educational diagnosticians must have the knowledge, compassion, competence, and understanding to serve as a resource and advocate for students receiving special education services.

 

Caring Goals

What changes/values do you hope students will adopt? Feelings? Interests? Values?

  • Program participants should have a feeling of purpose in working to support students who receive special education services.

  • Program participants should learn to become confident advocates for students receiving special education services.

  • Program participants should learn about all required elements for students to meet eligibility requirements for special education services according to Texas Education Agency guidelines.

  • Program participants should learn to interpret and explain evaluation results to stakeholders in layman’s terms.

 

"Learning-How-to-Learn" Goals

  • What would you like for students to learn about:

  • How to facilitate the evaluation process for special educations services that includes obtaining consent for testing, evaluation students, interpreting results, writing reports, providing recommendations, and participating in the Individualized Education Plan meeting through collaborating with colleagues, learning activities, and exploration.

Innovation Plan Influence

Learning environment factors analysis, questions formulating a significant learning environment, and the 3 Column table will serve as a guide for my innovation plan. These documents clearly outline goals I have for program participants and how these goals align directly with activities. Also, there are clear evaluation tools that will be utilized to evaluate the participants’ progress towards each goal. Most importantly, these documents will assist the teacher in facilitating activities, with the assessment tool in mind, to ensure students are guided in the appropriate direction to acquire required knowledge to fulfill their role as an educational diagnostician with fidelity.

bottom of page